Animals, Wildlife and Insects, Published 23 April 2026
The Great Emu War: The Only War Where the Enemy Tasted Like Chicken.
In 1932, Australia declared war. Not on a rival nation, but on 20,000 flightless birds. After WWI, veteran-settlers in Western Australia were struggling to grow wheat during the Great Depression when a massive "feathered infantry" of emus invaded their farms. Desperate, the government didn't send a pest controller - they sent the Royal Australian Artillery armed with two Lewis machine guns and 10,000 rounds of ammunition. It was supposed to be a slaughter; it turned into a slapstick comedy.
The military quickly realized they were outmatched by "guerrilla" bird tactics. The emus didn't march in formation; they split into tiny tactical units and sprinted at 50 km/h in every direction. Major G.P.W. Meredith, the commander in charge, was stunned by the birds' "bullet-carrying capacity," noting that even after being hit, they just kept running like feathered tanks. At one point, they tried mounting a machine gun to a truck, but the terrain was so bumpy the gunner couldn't aim, and the birds simply outpaced the vehicle!
By the time the "army" retreated in embarrassment, the stats were legendary for all the wrong reasons. The soldiers had expended nearly 10,000 bullets to achieve a confirmed kill count of only 986 emus. That is a staggering ratio of roughly 10 bullets per bird. The emus remained in possession of the wheat fields, completely unfazed by the military might of the British Empire's finest.
Today, the Great Emu War remains the ultimate "Only in Australia" historical moment. When asked in Parliament if medals would be struck for the campaign, one politician dryly suggested they should be given to the emus, since they had won every round. It’s a reminder that while you can bring a machine gun to a bird fight, never underestimate a 6-foot-tall bird with a bad attitude and a love for grain.
Two AI‑generated images inspired by 1932 Australian Army vehicles, created for educational purposes only. Emu image: Photo by Christel Sagniez via Pixabay - Public Domain.
Copyright and reuse
We encourage the sharing of history and information, and we support the responsible reuse of our original content.
Written articles. Unless a page says otherwise, our original written content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). You may copy, share, adapt and reuse it, including commercially, as long as you:
- credit “The Dave & Malou Channel” as the source and, where practical, link to the original page;
- link to the licence; and
- indicate any changes you made, without suggesting that we endorse you or your use.
Photographs and other images. Unless a credit or caption says otherwise, photographs and other images on this website, including illustrations, are available under CC BY 4.0 on the same conditions as our written articles. This covers images we created and images supplied by individuals, archives, libraries and families who have given permission for this use. Please check the credit and caption before you reuse an image, because some are not covered:
- Images marked “© The Dave & Malou Channel” must not be reproduced, reused or distributed without our prior written permission.
- For images credited to another person or organisation that are marked © or otherwise reserve their rights, please contact us before reuse so we can help clarify the copyright status and any permission you need. We cannot give permission on behalf of another copyright owner.
- Images labelled “Public Domain” may be used without permission, subject to any legal restrictions and the accuracy of that label.
Video, audio and third-party material. Video and audio are not covered by the licence unless a page says so. Copyright in material supplied by others, such as quotations, extracts and recordings, stays with its owner and is not covered unless we say so. Please contact us before reusing it.
Our name and logo. The name “The Dave & Malou Channel”, our logo and the look of the website are not covered by the licence. Please do not use them in a way that suggests we are connected with, or endorse, you.
Fair dealing. Nothing in our Website Terms limits your right to use material for private study, research, criticism, review, news reporting, or parody and satire, as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).
